·
We publish letscodeit.dev blog posts from a separate GitHub repository. The Next.js app fetches markdown at runtime with a one-hour cache,…
GEO (generative engine optimization) is how you structure and publish content so AI chatbots and answer engines quote your pages when…
When you send a message to an LLM, you are not paying for characters or words. You pay for tokens . A token is the unit the model splits…
Japan's top court has ruled that artificial intelligence cannot be listed as an inventor on patent applications.
This decision aligns with similar rulings in other jurisdictions, reinforcing the notion that only humans can be recognized as inventors. The ruling comes amid ongoing global discussions about the role of AI in the creative process and its implications for intellectual property law. This case highlights the evolving legal landscape as technology continues to advance.
Source: japannews.yomiuri.co.jp
I agree with the decision. AI lacks the intent and consciousness needed to be considered an inventor.
This ruling is consistent with other countries, but does it stifle innovation by not recognizing AI's role?
Comments